US House votes to sanction ICC over Israel-Gaza arrest warrants (2024)

ByRachel Looker,BBC News, Washington

The US House of Representatives has voted to pass legislation that would sanction the International Criminal Court (ICC) after its prosecutor applied for arrest warrants against Israeli officials.

The move comes after The Hague-based court's prosecutor said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant should be arrested on charges relating to the war in Gaza.

The prosecutor is also seeking warrants for three leaders of Hamas.

The bill, proposed by pro-Israel Republicans, targets ICC officials involved in the case by blocking their entry to the US.

On Tuesday, it passed with a majority of Republican support by a vote of 247-155. Two Republicans voted "present" and 42 pro-Israel Democrats crossed the aisle to back the legislation.

Though the bill passed in the House, it is not expected to become law.

The legislation will likely be ignored by Democrats who control the US Senate, where it would have to pass before it could be signed into law by the president.

But President Joe Biden has also indicated that he "strongly opposes" the bill and the administration has said it does not support the sanctions.

If it did become law, however, the legislation would also revoke any US visas held by ICC officials and restrict them from making property transactions in the US.

Some Senate Democrats, like John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, an outspoken supporter of Israel, have indicated they would support legislation sanctioning the court.

“I really would like to sanction the ICC for that. That was trash,” Fetterman said of the arrest warrants.

Congressman Chip Roy, a Texas Republican who introduced the legislation in the House, titled the Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act, has called the ICC “a massive threat to US sovereignty”.

The Democrats who opposed the measure largely support Israel, but have criticised Mr Netanyahu's conservative government. Some Democratic opponents said it risked forcing the US to sanction ally nations that support the ICC.

When the measure cleared the House Rules Committee on Monday, Jim McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat, said: “This bill makes a mockery of the rules-based international order that America helped build.”

The bill's passage comes shortly after Mr Netanyahu was invited by US lawmakers to deliver a speech to Congress this summer, although the date of his speech has not been finalised.

Last month, ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan said he had "reasonable grounds" to believe that Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant, as well as Hamas’s Gaza leader Yahya Sinwar, military chief Mohammed Deif and political leader Ismail Haniyeh, bore "criminal responsibility" for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the war in Gaza.

It marked the first time the ICC has targeted the top leader of a close US ally.

"The ICC has to be punished for this action," Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said on Tuesday. "We cannot allow this to stand."

"If the ICC was allowed to do this and go after the leaders of countries whose actions they disagree with, why would they not come after America?"

Israel’s government and Hamas reacted with outrage to Mr Khan's announcement last month.

Mr Netanyahu denounced the warrant applications against him and Mr Gallant as a “moral outrage of historic proportions”.

Mr Gallant accused the prosecutor of drawing a “despicable” parallel between Israel and Hamas and attempting to deny his country’s right to self-defence.

Hamas - which is proscribed as a terrorist organisation by Israel, the US and other countries - demanded the cancellation of the warrant applications for its leaders and denounced what it called Mr Khan's attempts “to equate the victim with the executioner".

If the ICC’s judges decide to issue the arrest warrants, it will be up to its 124 member states - including the UK and many other US allies - to decide whether or not to enforce them.

The White House said in a statement on Monday that while the ICC prosecutor’s warrant applications for Israeli leaders were "outrageous", it did not support sanctioning the ICC.

"There are more effective ways to defend Israel, preserve US positions on the ICC, and promote international justice and accountability, and the administration stands ready to work with the Congress on those options,” it said.

Created by a UN treaty in 2002, the ICC investigates and brings to justice those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, intervening when national authorities cannot or will not prosecute.

The US - like Israel - is not a member of the ICC and does not recognise its jurisdiction, but has backed its previous prosecutions and arrest warrants not related to Israel and the Palestinians.

In 2020 under the Trump administration, the US imposed sanctions on top ICC officials, including Mr Khan’s predecessor, after the court began investigating alleged war crimes committed by the US and others in the Afghan conflict.

The ongoing conflict in Gaza began when Hamas gunmen attacked southern Israel on 7 October, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 others hostage, according to Israeli authorities.

At least 36,470 people have since been killed in Gaza during Israel’s military campaign to destroy Hamas, according to the Hamas-run health ministry.

US House votes to sanction ICC over Israel-Gaza arrest warrants (2024)

FAQs

US House votes to sanction ICC over Israel-Gaza arrest warrants? ›

On Tuesday, it passed with a majority of Republican support by a vote of 247-155. Two Republicans voted "present" and 42 pro-Israel Democrats crossed the aisle to back the legislation. Though the bill passed in the House, it is not expected to become law.

Who voted to sanction the ICC? ›

The vote was 247-155, “with nearly every Republican and a few dozen Democrats voting for it,” NBC News reported. Despite White House opposition, 42 Democrats backed the measure, demonstrating strong bipartisan support for pressure on the ICC.

Does the US extradite to the ICC? ›

U.S. Passes the Foreign Relations Authorization Act

The Foreign Relations Authorization Act contains prohibitions against directing any U.S. financial support to the ICC (section 705) and against the extradition of any U.S. citizen to a foreign country that may surrender them to the ICC (section 706).

Can the US be tried in the ICC? ›

There are limited situations in which the ICC has jurisdiction over the nationals of countries such as the US that have not joined the Rome Statute. This includes when a citizen of a non-member country commits war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide on the territory of an ICC member country.

Does the ICC have jurisdiction over the US? ›

For similar reasons, the United States will provide no support in recognition to the International Criminal Court. As far as America is concerned, the ICC has no jurisdiction, no legitimacy, and no authority.

Why did the US vote against the ICC? ›

The US fought hard against this provision in the negotiations leading to the ICC's founding, fearing that it could open US citizens to prosecution, but it lost the argument. The US regards the prosecution of its citizens before an international body without US consent as a violation of its sovereignty.

What countries voted against the ICC? ›

The seven countries that voted against the treaty were China, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Qatar, the U.S., and Yemen. Israel's opposition to the treaty stemmed from the inclusion in the list of war crimes "the action of transferring population into occupied territory".

Which countries do not recognize ICC? ›

The Hague-based ICC seeks to investigate and prosecute those responsible for grave offenses such as genocide and war crimes. There are 124 member countries, but dozens of governments are not ICC parties, including China, India, Israel, Russia, and the United States.

Is Israel part of the ICC? ›

Israel is not a member of the ICC and disputes the ICC's jurisdiction, presenting the point of view according to which Palestine is not a sovereign state capable of being a party to the Rome Statute. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu repeatedly condemned the allegations and investigation as "antisemitic".

Why is the ICC not effective? ›

Two of these hindrances are that: firstly, the ICC has been accused of only targeting the African continent; and secondly, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute) has no enforcement mechanism against the state parties who refuse to cooperate with the court.

What triggers ICC jurisdiction? ›

Subject Matter Jurisdiction

An alleged crime must be either a war crime, a crime against humanity, or genocide, as defined in the Rome Statute. If the alleged crime does not fall within one of these definitions, the case cannot move forward at the ICC.

Is Palestine a member of the ICC? ›

Palestine became the 123rd member of the International Criminal Court (ICC) On April 1, 2015. By joining the ICC, Palestinian leaders hope to increase their political leverage by threatening to bring charges against Israeli officials for war crimes committed in the Occupied Territories.

How many cases has the ICC prosecuted? ›

There have thus far been 31 cases before the Court, with some cases having more than one suspect. ICC judges have issued 46 arrest warrants. Thanks to cooperation from States, 21 people have been detained in the ICC detention centre and have appeared before the Court. 17 people remain at large.

Can the UNSC veto the ICC? ›

No. The International Criminal Court is an independent judicial institution that it is not subject to political control.

Who enforced the ICC? ›

As a judicial institution, the ICC does not have its own police force or enforcement body; thus, it relies on cooperation with countries worldwide for support, particularly for making arrests, transferring arrested persons to the ICC detention centre in The Hague, freezing suspects' assets, and enforcing sentences.

Who gave the ICC power? ›

Congress expanded the commission's powers through subsequent legislation. The 1893 Railroad Safety Appliance Act gave the ICC jurisdiction over railroad safety, removing this authority from the states, and this was followed with amendments in 1903 and 1910.

Who does not recognize the ICC? ›

There are 124 member countries, but dozens of governments are not ICC parties, including China, India, Israel, Russia, and the United States. The ICC's ongoing investigations of alleged crimes including controversial arrest warrants in the Ukraine and Israel-Hamas wars represent a critical test for the court's power.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Edwin Metz

Last Updated:

Views: 6165

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (78 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edwin Metz

Birthday: 1997-04-16

Address: 51593 Leanne Light, Kuphalmouth, DE 50012-5183

Phone: +639107620957

Job: Corporate Banking Technician

Hobby: Reading, scrapbook, role-playing games, Fishing, Fishing, Scuba diving, Beekeeping

Introduction: My name is Edwin Metz, I am a fair, energetic, helpful, brave, outstanding, nice, helpful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.